This literature review analyzes the evolving legal standards for religious accommodation under Title VII, focusing on the shift from the long-standing "de minimis" undue hardship test established in Hardison (1977) to the more stringent standard clarified in Groff v. DeJoy (2023). While Groff raised the bar for rejecting accommodations, it left unresolved deeper challenges—particularly how courts evaluate whether a belief is genuinely religious and sincerely held. The article argues that these unresolved issues are becoming increasingly contentious, especially in cases like COVID-19 litigation, and proposes new frameworks for better addressing religiosity and sincerity in employment law. This source is classified as "Context" because it does not provide data on the impact of the de minimus standard. Therefore, it neither supports nor casts doubt on this topic's central claim.

Decades of the "de minimus" Standard Empowered Employers to Deny Lord's Day Requests
A Better Way to Engage with the Issues
Better Discourse is a place to find thoughtful, in-depth reflections on political, cultural, and theological topics, where contributors are committed to engaging constructively with opposing viewpoints. The platform emphasizes respectful, sustained dialogue and models virtues like patience, openness, and intellectual courage in tackling difficult topics.
Better Articles
Check out essays and opinion pieces championing thoughtful dialogue, not shouting matches.
ExploreBetter Sources
Engage with high-quality annotated sources on various topics. Become a contributor and add your voice.
ExploreBetter Book Reviews
Discover books that challenge assumptions, deepen empathy, and promote meaningful conversations.
ExploreBetter Tools
Try out research tools designed to help you dig deeper, think sharper, and speak with integrity.
Explore